11 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Bottom side profiles for two close stations at the southern crest of the EIA: Differences and comparison with IRI-2012 and NeQuick2 for low and high solar activity L. Perna et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.10.007
2. An examination of the Galileo NeQuick model: comparison with GPS and JASON TEC N. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-016-0553-x
3. TEC derived from some GPS stations in East African equatorial region and comparison with the TEC from NeQuick2 model F. Twinomugisha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.07.018
4. Assessment of the NeQuick-2 and IRI-Plas 2017 models using global and long-term GNSS measurements D. Okoh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.02.006
5. Ionospheric and plasmaspheric electron contents from space-time collocated digisonde, COSMIC, and GPS observations and model assessments S. Panda et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.12.005
6. Investigation on slab-thickness and B0 over an equatorial station in Africa and comparison with IRI model O. Odeyemi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.08.002
7. Comparison among IRI, GPS-IGS and ionogram-derived total electron contents M. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.01.113
8. Validation of the NeQuick 2 and IRI-2007 models in East-African equatorial region M. Nigussie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.04.016
9. Mathematical modelling of ionospheric TEC from Turkish permanent GNSS Network (TPGN) observables during 2009–2017 and predictability of NeQuick and Kriging models K. Ansari et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-018-3261-x
10. Morphology of GPS and DPS TEC over an equatorial station: validation of IRI and NeQuick 2 models O. Odeyemi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1457-2018
11. Performance of NeQuick-2 and IRI-Plas 2017 Models during Solar Maximum Years in 2013–2014 over Equatorial and Low Latitude Regions K. Iluore et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8020125